Please note:
This document is best suited for on-screen use. Some layout may have been
altered during the creation of this web page.
It is recommended that you download the "pdf" version of this
Course Profile for printing and the "Word, Mac, or WordPerfect"
versions for working with or adapting the Course Profile to meet your
instructional needs.
Course Profile
Understanding Canadian Law, Grade 11, University/College Preparation,
Catholic and Public
Course Overview
Course
Profiles are professional development materials designed to help teachers
implement the new Grade 11 secondary school curriculum. These materials were
created by writing partnerships of school boards and subject associations. The
development of these resources was funded by the Ontario Ministry of Education.
This document reflects the views of the developers and not necessarily those of
the Ministry. Permission is given to reproduce these materials for any purpose
except profit. Teachers are also encouraged to amend, revise, edit, cut, paste,
and otherwise adapt this material for educational purposes.
Any
references in this document to particular commercial resources, learning
materials, equipment, or technology reflect only the opinions of the writers of
this sample Course Profile, and do not reflect any official endorsement by the
Ministry of Education or by the Partnership of School Boards that supported the
production of the document.
© Queen’s
Printer for Ontario, 2001
Public
and Catholic District School Board Writing Teams – Understanding Canadian Law
Catholic
Project Manager
Mike
Taylor, London Catholic District School Board
Catholic
Writing Team
Marion
Austin, Lead Writer, London Catholic District School Board
Jim
Sweeney, London Catholic District School Board
Peter
Legge, London Catholic District School Board
Reviews
Dan
Keane, Religion Advisor
Oliver
Stoetzen, College Reviewer
Richard
Vendrig, Durham Catholic School Board
Public
Project Leader
Allan
Hux, Toronto District School Board, President OHCA
Public
Writing Team
Murray
Locke, Toronto District School Board
Alex
MacKinnon, Toronto District School Board
George
Mavraganis, Toronto District School Board
Reviewers
Don
Kendal, Toronto District School Board
John
Myers, OISE/UT
Ava
Szczurko, Toronto District School Board
Nancy
Smith, Toronto District School Board
Librarians
Esther
Rosenfeld, DWC, Library/Learning Resources, TDSB
Mark
Kaminski, Library Consultant, TDSB
Linda
McKee, Librarian, Albert Campbell CI, TDSB
Associations
Ontario
History and Social Studies Teacher Association (OHASSTA)
Ontario
History Consultants Association (OHCA)
Course
Overview
Understanding
Canadian Law, Grade 11, University/College Preparation, CLU3M
This
course explores legal issues that directly affect students’ lives. To develop
an appreciation of the Canadian legal system, students examine the historical
roots of Canadian law and expand on their understanding of the role of
government in making laws. Students also become familiar with the rights and
freedoms that all Canadians enjoy as a result of the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms. Students acquire a practical knowledge of Canada’s legal system,
both criminal and civil, and learn how to analyse legal issues. They are given
opportunities to develop informed opinions on legal issues and to defend those
opinions and communicate legal knowledge in a variety of ways and settings,
including legal research projects, and mock trials and debates.
This
course, Understanding the Law, extends the development of attitudes and values
based on Catholic social teachings for Ontario Catholic School Graduates.
Opportunities are given to students to integrate their faith with civic duty
and responsibility. Students become familiar with events which are a part of
the Catholic Church’s history such as the development of Mosaic law. When
students examine the question of human rights, they begin to appreciate the
relevance of Catholic social justice teachings. This course involves activities
that encourage students to act morally and legally as persons formed in
Catholic traditions. Law course graduates should be effective communicators of
the Good News of Jesus Christ in their attitudes and approaches to historical
and contemporary issues involving the law.
The
study of the Canadian legal system is an essential part of Canadian studies. An
understanding of the process of the
legal system is a vital part of the operation of a democratic and orderly
society and of a student’s education. Students who understand the processes of
the law in our society are much more likely to be effective members of Canadian
society. They are also be better equipped to understand and appreciate the dynamic
nature of the law in response to social change as well as the traditional
values the law seeks to uphold.
Students
gain an understanding of the origins of our legal system, the development of
human rights as a concept in our society, the process of criminal law, and the
settlement of civil disputes in our country. At every opportunity, students
learn the origins of the process and concepts, how they apply today and some of
the current issues that surround them. They are then able to see both the continuity
of the legal tradition and the current challenges that may shape change in the
law.
The
course content is appropriate to research into legal cases and social issues
that surround the law. By framing inquiry skills within a legal context,
students can be taught to appreciate the demands of critical thinking and
rigorous approaches to research as they develop skills in their senior years in
high school. The research and analytic skills necessary for the investigation
of these subjects should be dealt with over the entire course. The teaching of
skills over the entire length of the course allows students more time to
investigate and examine topics of interest and to develop research skills.
As
much as possible, students should be given opportunities to use technology to
conduct their research. Through use of these technologies, students become
familiar with the wide range of their potential use for future study and for
the working world. Increasingly, statistical information and professional
journals in the field of Canadian law are becoming available in electronic
format.
This is a university/college
preparation course that uses Canadian History in the Twentieth Century (Academic
or Applied) as a prerequisite. This course should equip students with the
knowledge and skills necessary for entrance to specific university and college
programs. Teaching and learning techniques emphasize the development of
independent learning and research skills that students are required to
demonstrate.
The course
is divided into four units of study. The table below indicates a suggested time
for these units.
|
* Unit 1 |
Heritage |
20 hours |
|
Unit 2 |
Rights and Freedoms |
20 hours |
|
* Unit 3 |
Criminal Law and Procedures |
35 hours |
|
Unit 4 |
Regulation and Dispute Resolution |
35 hours |
* These
units are fully developed in this Course Profile.
Time: 20 hours
Unit
Description
In this
introductory unit, students develop an understanding of what law is and why
societies have laws. An examination of the historical roots of Canadian law
assists students to develop an understanding of the Canadian legal system.
Students examine the role of government, its agencies, and the courts in
making, changing, or interpreting the law. Throughout the unit, students
incorporate many of the methods of legal inquiry. With the culminating
activity, students are asked to create a constitution for the new colony on
Mars. After an examination of a number of constitutions, students are asked to
create a new constitution and to present their work to their classmates, and
individually to submit a written report. For students in Catholic schools, this
unit provides an opportunity to study the Church’s legal traditions, in
particular Mosaic law. Students examine the Dogmatic Constitution of the
Catholic Church and enhance their understanding of the rights and
responsibilities of Canadian citizenship.
Unit
Overview Chart
|
Cluster |
Expectations |
Assessment |
Focus |
|
1 The Need for Law |
HTV.01, LIV.03, HT1.01, HT1.02, LI1.03, LI4.03, CGE2b, 2d, 4e, 5e |
Knowledge/ Communication |
Examine different groups to determine types of rules. Examine the need for and the purposes of law. |
|
2 The Historical Roots of Law |
HTV.02, LIV.01, LIV.02, HT2.01, HT2.02, HT2.03, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI3.01, LI4.04, CGE1d, 2a, 3b, 7e, 7g |
Knowledge/ Communication Application |
Locate ancient civilizations on a map. Examine quotes from legal historical figures. Research contributions of different groups to Canadian legal system. Complete an organizer. |
|
3 The Constitution of Canada |
HTV.03, LIV.03, HT3.01, LI1.04, LI4.03, CGE2b, 2d, 7h |
Knowledge/ Communication Application |
Define what a constitution is. Examine the continual evolution of the Canadian Constitution. Examine the Canadian Constitution. |
|
4 Role of Government, Courts, and individuals in making, interpreting and changing the law |
HTV03, LIV.02, LIV.03, HT3.02, HT3.03, HT3.04, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI3.01, LI3.03, LI4.04CGE2b, 2d, 3b, 3c, 4a, 7e |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Examine reasons why laws change. Propose a new law or change an existing one. Study process of making a law. |
|
5 Categories and Types of Laws |
HTV.03, HT1.03, HT1.04, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI4.03, CGE2b, 2d, 7h |
Knowledge/ Communication |
Examine classifications of law. Examine different scenarios and determine if public/private law and which classification. |
|
6 The Martian Constitution |
LIV.03, LI4.01, LI4.02, LI4.05, CGE2b, 2d, 3f, 5a, 5e |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Design and present a new constitution. |
Unit
Culminating Activity
The
Martian Constitution
– After examining a number of constitutions from different time periods,
countries and organizations, students create a constitution for a new colony on
the planet Mars.
Time: 20 hours
Unit
Description
This unit
explores the sources of Canadian rights and freedoms. Students examine how
rights and freedoms may differ and conflict. An examination of historical and
contemporary barriers to the equal enjoyment of human rights in Canada helps
students evaluate the impact of these barriers. Finally, as a result of their
study of the rights and freedoms enshrined in Canadian law, students develop an
understanding of how these rights and freedoms are interpreted, limited, and
enforced in Canada and in Ontario. For students in Ontario’s Catholic schools,
this unit enhances their understanding of the influence of the Catholic Church
on the development of human rights. They also examine the contributions of
individual Catholics and organizations in developing and increasing awareness
of human rights issues (e.g., Jean Vanier, Development and Peace)
Unit
Overview Chart
|
Cluster |
Expectations |
Assessment |
Focus |
|
1 The Development of Rights and Freedoms in Canada |
RFV.01, LIV.01, LIV.04, RF1.01, RF1.02, RF2.02, LI1.02, LI1.04, LI4.03, LI4.04 |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Identify influences on development of human rights in Canada. Explain key human rights concepts. Evaluate contributions of individuals/groups to human rights. |
|
2 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Ontario Human Rights Code |
RFV.03, LIV.01, LIV.04, RF3.01, RF3.05, RF3.06, LI.03, LI.04, LI4.03 |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication |
Describe rights and freedoms in the Canadian Charter. Explain protections provided by Ontario Human Rights Code. Distinguish between protections offered by these two documents. |
|
3 Rights and Freedoms - Conflict between, denial of, and limitations of |
RFV.02, RFV.03, LIV.01, LIV.04, RF1.03, RF2.01, RF3.02, LI1.01, LI.1.03, LI1.04, LI4.02 |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Analyse situations in which rights and freedoms may conflict. Describe situations in which rights in Canada have been denied. Analyse situations in which a right or freedom may be limited. |
|
4 The Interpretation and Enforcement of Charter Rights and Freedoms |
RFV.03, LIV.04, RF3.03, RF3.04, LI1.04, LI4.03, LI4.04 |
Knowledge/ Communication |
Explain how human rights legislation and the courts attempt to balance minority and majority rights. Explain the role of the judiciary in interpreting the Charter and the role of the government in enforcing Charter rights. |
|
5 Human Rights Violations |
RFV.03, LIV.04, RF3.07, LI1.04, LI4.02, LI4.03 |
Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Describe procedures for hearing complaints about human rights violations. |
Unit
Culminating Activity - Suggestions
Human
Rights Violations -
Students prepare a case dealing with human rights violations and present to a
board such as the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the Board of Inquiry (Human
Rights Code), or the Office of the Ombudsman. The prepared case could include:
arguments outlining the human rights violations; relevant Charter sections; all
completed forms; oral presentation to a mock tribunal; suggestions for
appropriate remedies.
Legal
Report - Students
research a legal case in which there has been a violation of rights under the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and present their findings in a written
report. The report could include: detailed description of the rights violation;
explanation of which Charter Sections are relevant; possible remedies to
correct the violation. This would be a good activity in which to use Internet
research.
Time: 35 hours
Unit
Description
This unit
introduces students to the main concepts of criminal law in Canada. They first
examine specific terms that govern both the existence and classification of
crime. They then apply some of those understandings to the study of youth crime
and how Canadian society deals with this issue. Students then look at the
investigation of crime and the role of police in investigation and arrest. An
examination of the courts and trial process gives students a deeper
understanding of the adversarial system and the roles of various officials and
citizens in the court. Students look at the decision-making process involved in
sentencing criminals to prison, and the rights of victims in these situations.
Unit
Overview Chart
|
Cluster |
Expectations |
Assessment |
Focus |
|
1 The Definition of Crime |
CLV.01, CLV.03, CL1.01, CL1.02, LI1.01, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI4.03, CGE2b, 2d, 3b, 7h |
Knowledge/ Communication |
Develop a definition for crime. Use examples to apply their understanding of types of crime and conditions for a crime as well as conviction in court. |
|
2 The Law and Young People |
CLV.05, CL5.01, CL5.02, CL5.03, LI2.01, LI3.01, LI3.03, LI4.02, LI4.03, CGE 2b, 2d, 3c, 4f, 5e |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication |
Prepare a set of rights for young people. Compare the YOA with the Juvenile Delinquents Act. Use surveys in the school to prepare recommendations to a Parliamentary Committee |
|
3 Arrest and Pre-Trial Process |
CLV.02, CL2.01, CL2.02, CL2.03, LI1.01. LI1.04, CGE2b, 2d, 4f, 7h |
Knowledge/ Application |
Students research and present short role-plays on
pre-trial procedure. |
|
4 The Court System and Trial Process |
CLV.03, CL3.01, CL3.02, CL3.03, CL3.04, LI1.02, LI3.03, LI4.02, LI4.03, LI4.06, CGE 2b, 2c, 5b, 5g, 7h |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Application |
Investigate Canadian trial procedure. Create a poster visually displaying the jobs layout of the court. Evaluate the role of the jury system. |
|
5 Sentencing and Prisons |
CLV.04, CL4.01, CL4.02, CL4.03, CL4.04, LI2.01, LI3.03, LI4.01, LI4.03, CGE 2b, 2d, 3c, 4f, 7h |
Knowledge/ Application |
Brainstorm purposes of sentencing. Prepare short oral reports on the various types of sentences and programs. Prepare a visitor’s pamphlet for a model. |
|
6 Mock Trial |
HTV.03, CLV.02, CLV.03, CLV. 04, CLV. 05, LIV.01, LIV.02, LIV.03, LIV.04, CL1.01, CL1.03, CL2. 01, CL3.01, CL3.02, CL3.03, CL3.04, CL4.02, CL4.03, CL5.03, LI1.02, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI2.01, LI2.02, LI2.04, LI4.01, LI4.02, LI4.03, LI4.04, LI4.05, LI4.06 |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Application |
Students research and role-play a case in Canadian criminal law. |
Unit
Culminating Activity - Suggestions
A
mock trial is a recommended culminating activity for this unit. Students are
involved in researching the various aspects of the court as well as the various
roles in the court system. The trial could then be presented in a larger room
in the school such as the dramatic arts room.
An
alternative culminating activity would be for students to follow the process of
a criminal trial, if possible, using the various electronic media. Students
could then summarize, analyse, and react to the process of this trial.
Time: 35 hours
Unit
Description
Students
study the structure of the Canadian private law system. The unit is divided
into four areas of concentration. The sub-topics within the unit are organized
in a manner that builds upon the understanding of the differences between
criminal and civil law, which leads to an examination of how the processes,
legal institutions, and methods involved in bringing a civil dispute to trial
operate. This leads to an examination of how the law applies to family matters.
Finally, students analyse the role of law as it applies to contractual
obligations, torts, and claims for compensation for personal loss. Students
continue to expand their skills of legal inquiry in this unit. This unit offers
students an excellent opportunity to further develop research skills in the
analysis and interpretation of data related to private and civil law
Unit
Overview Chart
|
Cluster |
Expectations |
Assessment |
Focus |
|
1 |
RDV.01, RD1.01, RD1.02, LI1.01, LI1.03, LI1.04, CGE 2b, 2d, 5g |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Differences between Civil and Criminal Law |
|
2 |
RDV.02, RD2.01, RD2.01, RD2.03, LI1.02, LI4.01, LI4.03, LI4.06, CGE 2b, 2c, 2d |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Civil Procedure |
|
3 |
RDV.03, RD3.01, RD3.02, RD3.03, RD3.04, RD3.05, LI1.03, LI3.01, LI3.03, LI4.03, LI4.06, CGE1b, 1d, 1i, 2b, 2d, 3d, 6c, 7a |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Marriage, Separation, and Divorce |
|
4 |
RDV.04, RD4.01, RD4.02. RD4.03, RD4.04, LI1.02, LI2.01, LI2.03, LI4.03, LI4.06, CGE 1d, 2a, 2c, 3b, 3d, 4f, 5g, 7a, 7h |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Civil Wrongs and Remedies |
Unit
Culminating Activity
A
culminating activity for this unit could be a public information legal pamphlet
developed in groups to explain a particular aspect of private law to the
general public. Students could use a variety of technologies in their research
as well as a presentation of the final product to the class.
This course provides students an
opportunity to explore, analyse, and reflect on the study of law through
diverse teaching and learning strategies. Students have multiple opportunities
to hone their skills in communication through formal presentations, role
playing, writing in role, and persuasive writing. Critical thinking skills such
as formulating a thesis, identifying bias and viewpoint, debating, analysing primary
sources, and problem-solving are a focus of many activities. Focused inquiry,
data analysis, note-taking and guided Internet searches are examples of the
research skills that students practise. Co-operative group learning is another
important active learning strategy fundamental to many activities in this
profile. Tasks are designed to develop skills and concepts through a range of
student learning styles. Each unit overview states specific teaching/learning
strategies as well as the skills development and assessment/evaluation. Many
important skills are developed in the activities in the units.
The
Teaching/Learning Strategies employed in the Grade 11 University/College Law
course should:
·
encourage
maximum student engagement in the learning activity;
·
encourage
student choice regarding the processes and products of learning in the Law
classroom;
·
include
whole class, small group, and individual instruction;
·
use
electronic technology as appropriate;
·
address
a variety of learning styles;
·
provide
opportunities for genuine inquiry - to generate questions, apply a variety of
investigative approaches and communicate learning in a variety of ways;
·
encourage
students in self and peer evaluation;
·
use
formative assessment to provide opportunities for practice and consolidation;
·
make
authentic connections with the classroom, the school, and the local community;
·
respect
the cultural diversity of
The
subject discipline of Law has its own particular ways in which language is used
to express concepts. In order to help all students, but especially ESL/ELD
students, teaching and learning strategies should show formative attention to
the following aspects of language in written and oral forms:
·
specialized
vocabulary/idioms
·
use
of a wide range of tenses, and of active and passive voice
·
words,
phrases, and clausal structures that indicate:
·
sequence/chronology
·
cause/effect
relationships
·
contrast/comparatives/superlatives
·
statements
of opinion, interpretation, inference
·
statements
of speculation/hypothesis/prediction
·
statements
of belief, intent, necessity, persuasion, evaluation, definition
·
explanations
of reason
·
formation
of questions for formal and informal circumstances, oral or written
·
active
listening skills: e.g., phrases and syntax that express encouragement, requests
for repetition, clarification, and restatement
·
activities
such as reading/listening tasks (case-study/video-viewing) that need a specific
and concrete product expected of students
·
completion
of a graphic organizer/re-enactment or structured oral response
·
note-taking/summarizing
·
non-verbal
communication skills, of particular importance to presentation tasks
Language development and the expression of
concepts taught are greatly facilitated if written tasks are reinforced by oral
tasks, and vice versa. All learners with difficulties benefit greatly if models
or scaffolds for oral and written expressive communicative functions are
initially provided for them by their teachers.
The
Achievement Chart, which is the basis for assessment and evaluation in this
course, is found on pages 246 and 247 of The
The
The
activities and performance tasks in this profile are examples of some
strategies teachers may use with their classes. The following are some generic
suggestions for assessment and evaluation techniques in Law courses:
·
provide
opportunities for student learning to improve by using formative assessment
tools in each unit, e.g., visual organizers, practice quiz, self and peer
editing of written work, teacher feedback;
·
model
the skill that you want the students to master, e.g., formulating a thesis,
note-taking, report writing;
·
share
with your students clearly-developed criteria for their assessment and
evaluation, e.g., checklists, rubrics. Developing these tools with students
helps to clarify how and why they are being assessed or evaluated;
·
accommodate
a variety of learning styles and special needs through the modifications
suggested in the activities and suggestions for how they may improve their
performance;
·
use
assessment tools that are appropriate for the expectations being addressed and
that relate to the categories on the achievement charts;
·
ensure
that criteria used for assessment match expectations in culminating activities
that involve performance assessment;
·
in
performance tasks involving group work, ensure that these tasks build in
positive interdependence and individual accountability;
·
rubrics
should make it clear to students why they scored as they did and what steps
they need to take to improve;
·
match
the assessment/evaluation strategy to the teaching/learning strategy.
Students
should become competent researchers and writers through the activities
suggested in this profile. They will also practise and demonstrate a variety of
written and verbal communication skills.
Seventy
per cent of the grade will be based on assessments and evaluations conducted
throughout the course. Thirty per cent of the grade will be based on a final
evaluation in the form of an examination, performance, essay, and/or other
method of evaluation.
Final
Course Summative Evaluation
The
Ontario Curriculum, Grades 9 to 12, Program Planning and Assessment states that thirty percent of the
grade is based on a final evaluation in the form of an examination,
performance, essay, and/or other method of evaluation suitable to the course
content and administered towards the end of the course.
Decisions
about how the thirty percent will be allocated are ultimately up to individual
teachers, schools or boards. However, it is recommended that the thirty percent
should be divided between at least two activities.
An
examination of the expectations for the course, Understanding Canadian Law,
reveals a number which would be best accommodated through a research paper.
These expectations would include the following:
Overall
Expectations
LIV.01 -
use research methods appropriately to gather, organize, and synthesize
information;
LIV.02 -
evaluate the credibility of sources.
Specific
Expectations
LI1.02 -
effectively conduct legal research, using traditional and non-traditional
sources of information;
LI2.03 -
evaluate the credibility of sources and information by checking for logical
errors, accuracy, and underlying assumption, including prejudices and biases;
LI2.04 -
evaluate the credibility of published and Internet sources by analysing the
quantity and quality of evidence presented, as well as the methods used by
authors to support their claims (e.g., the use of footnotes);
LI4.05
- write clear, coherent, and logically organized reports, papers, and essays,
observing the rules for ethical use of research material and following an
accepted format for documenting sources.
It is
expected that students would conduct research and write their essay throughout
the course. To assist students with the writing of their paper, teachers should
use a process that has students submit different components of the paper such
as the selection of a topic, resource list, introduction, and outline. It is
also suggested that teachers spend some time in class teaching students how to
evaluate Internet sources. The essay should be handed in towards the end of the
course for evaluation.
Every
effort is made to assist all students in achieving success in their Law course.
Specific adaptations and accommodations are recommended with each activity.
Teachers should realize that if expectations are modified extensively, then the
nature of the credit can be affected. Individual Education Plans for
exceptional students provide teachers with specific learning strategies that
work best with individual students. As well, the proficiency levels outlined in
The
There
are a variety of strategies that can be used for those students with special
needs. History teachers are encouraged to work with the Special Education
teacher to review exceptional students’ IEPs (Individual Education Plans) to
decide the best course of action to assist them in meeting the expectations of
the Grade 11 University/College Law course. Students with specific learning
difficulties require specific modifications to meet their particular needs in
terms of learning, communication, and expression strengths and weaknesses.
Students with attention deficit and behavioural challenges need to have
opportunities for active learning and interaction within a controlled
environment. The variety of learning strategies and student performance tasks
provide teachers with some guidance, but each exceptional student’s program
will require appropriate modifications based on the assessment and suggestions
included in the Individual Education Plan.
Technology can also be important in
modifying activities and accommodating for special needs. For example, prior
bookmarking of key Internet sites will help to maximize on-line time. There are
many enrichment opportunities for gifted students who may explore the issues
and personalities in greater depth or from different perspectives.
When
planning adaptation(s) of the Understanding Canadian Law, Grade 11,
University/College courses for ESL students, teachers should recognize and
reflect on all aspects of language development. The academic needs of the newly
arrived student to
Teachers
should select resources that relate to the ESL/ELD Curriculum Policy Document
Strand’s expectations:
Like all
learners, ESL/ELD learners have different learning styles. Therefore, a wide
variety of teaching/learning strategies and assessment/evaluation techniques
should be used in any classroom. Many assessment tools for ESL/ELD students are
formative, both in the assessment of understanding of concepts and the
acquisition and practise of the specifically identified language forms
necessary to express those concepts. The ESL/ELD learners’ self-esteem and
motivation to learn benefits greatly when courses allow expression of their
individual skills, interests, and varied life experiences in the family,
communities, and countries of origin. Courses should also display sensitivity
to the diversity of cultural, ethnic, religious beliefs and customs,
socio-economic levels, and family structures of newcomer. Subject content
should be presented in ways that focus on its relevance to ESL/ELD students
needs, be they communicative/language, acculturation, day-to-day survival,
social, physical, emotional, or cognitive.
Note
Concerning Permissions
Units in
this profile make reference to the use of specific texts, magazines, films, and
videos. Before reproducing materials for student use from books and magazines,
teachers need to ensure that their board has a Cancopy licence and that
resources they wish to use are covered by this licence. Before screening videos
for their students, teachers need to ensure that their board/school has
obtained the appropriate public performance videocassette licence from an
authorized distributor (e.g., Audio Cine Films Inc.). Teachers are also
reminded that much of the material on the Internet is protected by copyright.
That copyright is usually owned by the person or organization that created the
work. Reproduction of any work or a substantial part of any work on the
Internet is not allowed without the permission of the owner.
Any
current approved Canadian Law textbook.
A
Case for
ISBN 0-7730-5010-8; Vol. III Social Justice (ISBN 0-7730-50124),
Pocket
Criminal Code 2001.
Human
Rights in Employment Law.
Wrongful Dismissal Handbook.
Annotated
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Correctional Services
Teaching
Youth Justice: A Teacher’s Manual for the Young Offenders Act, Public Legal Education, 1996.
The
Classroom Puzzler Educational Resource Package. Peache House Press, Inc.
Note: The URLs for the websites have been
verified by the writer prior to publication. Given the frequency with which
these designations change, teachers should always verify the websites prior to
assigning them for student use.
Laws
of
Judgements
from the Supreme Court, 1985-2000 – http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/
Site
for Canadian Law and resource materials – http://www/acjnet.org/acjeng.html
The
Law Room – http://www.uottawa.ca/hrrec/lawroom/lawroom.html
Junior
High Justice – http://edm.johnhoward.org/education/graphics.html
Youth
FAQ – http://www.acjnet.org/youthfaq/index.html
Canadian
Charter – http://www.pch.gc.ca/ddp-hrd/ENGLISH/charter/contents.htm
Research
Tool and Law Links –
http://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/law/Research/Research_index.html
Canadian
Legal Resources on the Net – http://www.nbnet.mb.ca/~psim_law.html
Canadian
Human Rights Tribunal – http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/
Guide
to Ontario Courts – http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/english.htm
Law
Related Internet Resources – http://infolibrary.yorke.ca/depts/law/links.htm
Law
Commission of
Jurist
Canadian
Bar Association—contests and mock trial information – http://www.cba.ca
Supreme
Court Reports – http://www.droit.umontreal.ca/e_index
Legal
Line – http://www.legalline.ca
Canadian
Law – http://www.CanLaw.com
RCMP
– http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/
Best
Guide to Canadian Legal Research – http://legalresearch.org/
United
Nations Declaration of Human Rights – http://www.un.org/
Canadian
Resource Bank for Democracy and Human Rights – http://www.front.web.net/canadem
Human
Rights in Action – http://www.un.org/Pubs/CyerSchoolBus/humanrights/index/html
World
A
Technology of Citizenship: Learning Democracy –
http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/CASAE/cnf99/eharris.htm
Canadian
Encyclopedia World Edition. McClelland and Stewart, 1999: Maclean’s updates.
(Morin and Latimer cases; conflict-resolution mechanisms: courts, mediation,
arbitration) – http://CBC.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view.cgi (Milgaard compensation)
– http://www.canada.gc.ca/howgoc/govorg_e.html (Government Organizational
Chart: Judiciary) – http://www.fcnetwork.org/4thnorth/joyceand.html (Joyce and
David Milgaard presentation)
United Nations Charter –
http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/index.html
Canadian Elections on the Internet
http://www.library.ubc.ca/poli/cpwebe.htmlwww.artsci.lsu.edu/poli/research.htmlwww.lsu.edu/guests/poli/public_html
StudyWeb:
Government & Politics: World Government and Canadian Government
– http://www.studyweb.com/links907.htm
Department
of Justice: Law – http://canada.justice.gc.ca/Loireg/index_en.html
Sources
of Canadian Federal and Provincial Legislation: LIS2133: Legal Literature
– http://www.fis.utoronto.ca/courses/LIS/2133/legisour.htm
Local
or national newspapers, magazines, indexes, databases & full text
periodicals at BCIT Libraries
– http://www.lib.bcit.bc.ca/le.htm
Newspapers
and Magazines and Editorials –
http://www.webwombat.com.au/intercom/newsrs/index.htm –
http://www.fact.com/eof.htm
The
Mounties Finally Get Their Man – http://www.singh~songh.org
Summary
of Choosing a Government, Ontario Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1998
(OCCB@OCCB.on.ca) – http://www.OCCB.on.ca
A
Question of Justice,
TV/Ontario, Ministry of the Attorney General – A series of 10 videos dealing
with a variety of legal issues. Also includes a teacher’s manual with each
episode.
CBC
News in Review – In
particular the following episodes have relevant segments:
Sept.
1990 – Donald Marshall; Feb. 1991 – Canada’s Anti- Hate Law: The Keegstra Case;
Oct. 1991 – Canada’s Rape Shield Law; Nov. 1991 – Capital Punishment in Canada;
Feb. 1992 – Nancy B.: The Right to Decide; May 1992 – Freedom for David
Milgaard; Mar. 1993 – The Trials of Guy Paul Morin; Oct. 1993 – Sue Rodriguez:
Choosing Death; Feb. 1994 – Judges: The Use of Power; May 1994 – The New
Criminals: Trigger Happy; Dec. 1994 – After the Crime: Is Justice Served?; Mar.
1995 – DNA Evidence: Science or Justice?; Apr. 1995 – Guns Control Law: To Stop
The Killing, Cameras in Court: Justice Seen to be Done; Sept. 1995 – The
Latimer Case: Mercy or Murder?; Oct. 1995 – The Bernardo Case: The Monster
Among Us; Feb. 1998 – The Krever Inquiry: Assigning Blame; Apr. 1998 –
Marijuana: Taking Another Look; Mar. 2000 – Private Prisons: The Profit Motive;
May 2000 – Reena Virk: A Senseless Death, Conditional Sentencing: Effective or
Not?
TVO
Marketing
Freedom
Had A Price, NFB,
(C9194 043/EC009)
Twice
Condemned, NFB,
(117C 0193 095)
Human
Rights in
You’re
Under Arrest, NFB,
(106C 0179 088)
Government
in
The
Road to Patriation,
NFB (106C 0184 013)
Justice
Denied, NFB, (C9189
100/EC009)
High
Risk Offender, NFB,
(C9198 073/EC009)
When
Women Kill, NFB,
(C9194 002/EC009)
Post
Mortem: A Look at Forensic Science. CBC
Euthanasia: CBC
Teacher-librarian/Resource
teacher
Priest
or Chaplain
This list
will vary based on locality, but could include:
·
lawyer
·
judge
·
court
clerk, court reporter
·
police
officer – municipal, provincial, federal
·
probation
officer
·
member
of parliament
·
member
of provincial parliament
·
member
of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association
·
member
of either the John Howard Society or Elizabeth Frye
Books
(Note:
These are mainly for teacher reference but some may be adapted for student
use.)
Christian
Justice.
Do
Justice! CCB (
Dreams,
Dilemmas and Decisions.
Gaudium
et Spes. Second
Vatican Council document.
Love
Kindness. Jesuit
Centre for Social Justice.
On
Choosing a Government.
Rerum
Novarum. Papal
Encyclical.
Sollicitudo
Rei Sociali. Papal
Encyclical, 1986.
Summa
Theologica. St.
Thomas Aquinas.
The
Law course provides students with the opportunity to acquire skills and
knowledge they need in order to pursue education and career goals and carry out
social responsibility. This course provides students with learning experiences
that are consistent with program goals outlined in Choices into Action,
Guidance and Career Education Program Policy for
This
course also gives consideration to integrating technology across the curriculum
(i.e., use of the Internet in research), students with special needs
(modifications when necessary), using the community as a resource (visits to
law courts), and using the Library/Resource Centre. Teachers should also
integrate the values of anti-discrimination, respect, and violence prevention
into the course of study. When this course is taught in an adult setting more
emphasis can be placed on the students’ own personal experience with legal
issues.
Students
taking this course may earn either an optional credit or an additional
compulsory credit for diploma requirements.
Coded
Expectations, Understanding Canadian Law, Grade 11, University/College
Preparation, CLU3M
HTV.01 · explain what law is and why societies have
laws and describe the different categories of law;
HTV.02 · identify the historical roots of Canadian
law;
HTV.03 · explain who is responsible for law-making in
Law and
Society
HT1.01 – explain the meaning and function of law in
Canadian society;
HT1.02 – explain why all societies need laws;
HT1.03 – distinguish between the various categories
of law (e.g., substantive/procedural, common/statute);
HT1.04 – explain the meaning and nature of the
various types of law (e.g., criminal, constitutional, administrative, and private).
The
Historical Roots of Law
HT2.01 – assess the contributions of early legal
systems to contemporary Canadian law (e.g., the Code of Hammurabi, Mosaic law,
Roman law);
HT2.02 – describe key developments in English common
law and explain their influence on Canadian law (e.g., the adversarial system,
Magna Carta, the importance of precedent, the rule of law, the concept of
equity);
HT2.03 – explain how Roman law and codes of law such
as Justinian’s Code and the Napoleonic Code influenced the development of
Law-making
HT3.01 – identify the key components of the
Constitution of Canada, including the division of powers between the two levels
of government;
HT3.02 – describe the role of government, its
agencies, and the courts in making, changing, or interpreting the law;
HT3.03 – describe initiatives by individuals and
lobby groups to introduce new laws or change existing laws and explain why the
changes were needed;
HT3.04 – describe the process by which a bill becomes
law.
RFV.01 · describe the sources of Canadian rights and
freedoms and explain how rights and freedoms may differ and conflict;
RFV.02 · identify historical and contemporary
barriers to the equal enjoyment of human rights in
RFV.03 · describe the rights and freedoms enshrined
in Canadian law and explain how they are interpreted, how they may be limited,
and how they are enforced in
Rights
and Freedoms
RF1.01 – identify the influences on the development
of human rights in Canada (e.g., Magna Carta, the American Bill of Rights, the
French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, the Canadian Bill
of Rights, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights);
RF1.02 – explain key concepts associated with human
rights;
RF1.03 – analyse situations in which rights and
freedoms may conflict (e.g., when the right to freedom of expression conflicts
with legislation to ban hate literature).
Barriers
to Human Rights
RF2.01 – describe historical and contemporary
situations in which rights in Canada have been denied (e.g., rights of Japanese
in the Second World War, Aboriginal rights to land, women’s rights, rights of
physically or mentally challenged persons);
RF2.02 – evaluate the contribution of individual
citizens and organizations in developing and increasing awareness of human
rights issues (e.g., John Diefenbaker, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, women’s and
victims’ groups, Emily Murphy and the Famous Five/ Persons Case, the Assembly
of First Nations, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, the Civil Liberties
Association, the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund).
Human
Rights Legislation in
RF3.01 – describe the rights and freedoms found in
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms;
RF3.02 – analyse situations in which a right or
freedom may be justifiably limited (e.g., libel laws that limit the freedom of
the press);
RF3.03 – explain how human rights legislation and the
courts attempt to balance minority and majority rights;
RF3.04 – explain the role of the judiciary,
especially the Supreme Court of Canada, in interpreting the Charter and the
role of government in enforcing Charter rights;
RF3.05 – explain the protections provided under the
Ontario Human Rights Code;
RF3.06 – distinguish between the protections offered
under the federal Charter and those provided by the Ontario Human Rights Code;
RF3.07 – describe procedures for hearing complaints
about human rights violations (e.g., the role of the Ontario Human Rights
Commission, the Board of Inquiry [Human Rights Code], the Office of the
Ombudsman).
CLV.01 · summarize what constitutes a crime or
regulatory offence in
CLV.02 · describe the processes, legal institutions,
and methods involved in bringing a criminal case to trial;
CLV.03 · explain the structure and role of the
Canadian court system in criminal law;
CLV.04 · analyse the principles of sentencing,
including those relating to alternative methods of imposing sanctions or
regulating behaviour;
CLV.05 · explain how the criminal law applies to
young people.
What Is
a Crime?
CL1.01 – describe the elements that must exist for a
person to be convicted of a crime under Canadian law;
CL1.02 – differentiate between a summary conviction
and an indictable offence;
CL1.03 – explain the classifications and key elements
of crime described in the Canadian Criminal Code and related federal statutes
(e.g., crimes against the person, murder, manslaughter, assault).
Trial
Procedures
CL2.01 – describe the process of a police
investigation, including the questioning of an accused and the gathering of
evidence;
CL2.02 – identify the elements of a legal arrest,
including the rights of an accused under arrest or detention;
CL2.03 – describe different types of pre-trial
release mechanisms (e.g., own recognizance; with bail [money, property bond,
recognizance of a friend or relative]).
The
Court System
CL3.01 – summarize the structure of the criminal
court system, including avenues of appeal;
CL3.02 – describe the role of different individuals
involved in a criminal trial (e.g., lawyer, judge, jury, duty counsel, Crown
attorney);
CL3.03 – explain key aspects of the criminal trial
process, including jury selection and rules about the admissibility of evidence
and the burden of proof;
CL3.04 – identify legally accepted defences to
criminal charges.
Sentencing
CL4.01 – describe the main principles of sentencing;
CL4.02 – explain the various sentencing options
available, including alternative options (e.g., use of healing circles, peer
sentencing, victim-offender programs);
CL4.03 – analyse the role of victims and victim
impact statements in sentencing;
CL4.04 – explain the role of the prison system.
Criminal
Law and Young People
CL5.01 – describe the key differences between the
Juvenile Delinquents Act (1929), the Young Offenders Act (1984), and the
proposed replacement for the Young Offenders Act, the Youth Criminal Justice
Act;
CL5.02 – identify controversial aspects of the Young
Offenders Act and outline the arguments on both sides of these controversies;
CL5.03 – analyse areas of criminal law, besides those
covered in the Young Offenders Act, that may apply to young people (e.g.,
drinking and driving laws; alcohol, tobacco, and narcotics laws; laws relating
to violence, sexual assault, or harassment).
RDV.01 · distinguish between civil and criminal law;
RDV.02 · describe the processes, legal
institutions, and methods involved in bringing a civil dispute to trial and
resolution;
RDV.03 · explain how the law applies to family
matters;
RDV.04 · analyse the role of law as it applies to
contractual obligations and claims for compensation for personal injury or
loss.
Civil
and Criminal Law
RD1.01 – describe the differences between public law
(e.g., constitutional law, criminal law) and private law (e.g., family law,
contract law, tort law);
RD1.02 – describe the various areas of civil law
(e.g., family, contract, tort).
Dispute
Resolution
RD2.01 – describe the courts that try
civil actions and the types of cases tried in each (e.g., small claims court,
landlord and tenant court, family court);
RD2.02 – summarize the procedures involved
in bringing a civil action (e.g., statement of claim, statement of defence,
examination for discovery);
RD2.03 – describe the types of damages recognized in
civil court and the remedies available for enforcing judgement (e.g., special,
general, nominal, or punitive damages; injunctions).
Family
Matters
RD3.01 – list the legal requirements of a valid
marriage;
RD3.02 – distinguish between federal and provincial
powers in the area of family law;
RD3.03 – explain matrimonial property law as it
applies in marriage, common-law relationships, separation, and divorce, and on
the death of a spouse;
RD3.04 – explain the grounds for divorce and the
procedures available for resolving family disputes;
RD3.05 – explain the rights of support, custody, and
access, and what the state can do to enforce support or assume custody.
Contractual
Obligations and Torts
RD4.01 – define the elements of a legal contract
(e.g., offer and acceptance, consideration);
RD4.02 – explain when contractual performance can be
excused, who is provided extra protection in contract law, and what remedies
are available in law for breach of contract;
RD4.03 – explain what is an intentional tort and what
constitutes negligence in tort law;
RD4.04 – describe legally acceptable defences and
legal remedies to intentional and unintentional torts.
LIV.01 · use research methods appropriately to
gather, organize, and synthesize information;
LIV.02 · evaluate the credibility of sources;
LIV.03 · demonstrate an understanding of the dynamic
nature of law, including the way in which it evolves in response to technology
and changes in societal values;
LIV.04 · explain, discuss, and interpret legal
issues, orally and in writing, using a variety of formats.
Research
LI1.01 – formulate meaningful questions that lead to
a deeper understanding of a legal issue and of the different ways to approach
an issue;
LI1.02 – effectively conduct legal research, using
traditional and non-traditional sources of information (e.g., Internet
websites, multimedia technology, law libraries, community legal services);
LI1.03 – classify and clarify information, using
timelines, organizers, mind maps, concept webs, maps, graphs, charts, and
diagrams;
LI1.04 – compile summary notes in a variety of forms
and for a variety of purposes, including research and preparation for oral
presentations, tests, and examinations.
Evaluation
of Sources
LI2.01 – distinguish among opinions,
facts, and arguments in sources;
LI2.02 – identify the frame of reference
and purpose of data;
LI2.03 – evaluate the credibility of sources and
information by checking for logical errors, accuracy, and underlying
assumptions, including prejudices and biases;
LI2.04 – evaluate the credibility of published and
Internet sources by analysing the quantity and quality of evidence presented,
as well as the methods used by authors to support their claims (e.g., the use
of footnotes).
Understanding
of the Evolving Nature of Law
LI3.01 – explain how changes in attitudes and
societal values bring about changes in the law (e.g., censorship, gambling, and
drinking and driving laws; laws relating to women and children; laws protecting
the environment; laws regulating the workplace);
LI3.02 – evaluate the impact on the law of
technological change (e.g., developments in information technology, medical
technology, transportation technology);
LI3.03 – speculate on possible future developments in
law and the Canadian legal system based on changes in our society (e.g.,
changing attitudes and cultural differences).
Communication
LI4.01 – effectively present ideas, opinions, and
arguments orally (e.g., in role plays, interviews, simulations, debates, group
presentations, seminars);
LI4.02 – justify and support opinions, using proper
legal terminology and informed research;
LI4.03 – use legal terms accurately and appropriately
for a variety of purposes and audiences;
LI4.04 – create graphs, charts, organizers, images,
and illustrations to support oral and written presentations;
LI4.05 – write clear, coherent, and logically
organized reports, papers, and essays, observing the rules for ethical use of
research material and following an accepted format for documenting sources;
LI4.06 – identify and describe career opportunities
in the legal field.
The
graduate is expected to be:
A
Discerning Believer Formed in the Catholic Faith Community
who
CGE1a -illustrates
a basic understanding of the saving story of our Christian faith;
CGE1b -participates
in the sacramental life of the church and demonstrates an understanding
of the centrality of the Eucharist to our Catholic story;
CGE1c -actively
reflects on God’s Word as communicated through the Hebrew and Christian
scriptures;
CGE1d -develops
attitudes and values founded on Catholic social teaching and acts to
promote social responsibility, human solidarity and the common good;
CGE1e -speaks
the language of life... “recognizing that life is an unearned gift and
that a person entrusted with life does not own it but that one is called to
protect and cherish it.” (Witnesses to Faith)
CGE1f -seeks
intimacy with God and celebrates communion with God, others and creation
through prayer and worship;
CGE1g -understands
that one’s purpose or call in life comes from God and strives to discern
and live out this call throughout life’s journey;
CGE1h -respects
the faith traditions, world religions and the life-journeys of all
people of good will;
CGE1i -integrates
faith with life;
CGE1j -recognizes
that “sin, human weakness, conflict and forgiveness are part of the human
journey” and that the cross, the ultimate sign of forgiveness is at the heart
of redemption. (Witnesses to Faith)
An
Effective Communicator who
CGE2a -listens
actively and critically to understand and learn in light of gospel values;
CGE2b -reads,
understands and uses written materials effectively;
CGE2c -presents
information and ideas clearly and honestly and with sensitivity to others;
CGE2d -writes
and speaks fluently one or both of
CGE2e -uses
and integrates the Catholic faith tradition, in the critical analysis of the
arts, media, technology and information systems to enhance the quality of life.
A
Reflective and Creative Thinker who
CGE3a -recognizes
there is more grace in our world than sin and that hope is essential in facing
all challenges;
CGE3b -creates,
adapts, evaluates new ideas in light of the common good;
CGE3c -thinks
reflectively and creatively to evaluate situations and solve problems;
CGE3d -makes
decisions in light of gospel values with an informed moral conscience;
CGE3e -adopts
a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject areas
and experience;
CGE3f -examines,
evaluates and applies knowledge of interdependent systems (physical, political,
ethical, socio-economic and ecological) for the development of a just and
compassionate society.
A Self-Directed, Responsible, Life Long Learner
who
CGE4a -demonstrates
a confident and positive sense of self and respect for the dignity and welfare
of others;
CGE4b -demonstrates
flexibility and adaptability;
CGE4c -takes
initiative and demonstrates Christian leadership;
CGE4d -responds
to, manages and constructively influences change in a discerning manner;
CGE4e -sets
appropriate goals and priorities in school, work and personal life;
CGE4f -applies
effective communication, decision-making, problem-solving, time and resource
management skills;
CGE4g -examines
and reflects on one’s personal values, abilities and aspirations influencing
life’s choices and opportunities;
CGE4h -participates
in leisure and fitness activities for a balanced and healthy lifestyle.
A
Collaborative Contributor who
CGE5a -works
effectively as an interdependent team member;
CGE5b -thinks
critically about the meaning and purpose of work;
CGE5c -develops
one’s God-given potential and makes a meaningful contribution to society;
CGE5d -finds
meaning, dignity, fulfillment and vocation in work which contributes to the
common good;
CGE5e -respects
the rights, responsibilities and contributions of self and others;
CGE5f -exercises
Christian leadership in the achievement of individual and group goals;
CGE5g -achieves
excellence, originality, and integrity in one’s own work and supports these
qualities in the work of others;
CGE5h -applies
skills for employability, self-employment and entrepreneurship relative to
Christian vocation.
A
Caring Family Member who
CGE6a -relates
to family members in a loving, compassionate and respectful manner;
CGE6b -recognizes
human intimacy and sexuality as God given gifts, to be used as the creator
intended;
CGE6c -values
and honours the important role of the family in society;
CGE6d -values
and nurtures opportunities for family prayer;
CGE6e -ministers
to the family, school, parish, and wider community through service.
A
Responsible Citizen who
CGE7a -acts
morally and legally as a person formed in Catholic traditions;
CGE7b -accepts
accountability for one’s own actions;
CGE7c -seeks
and grants forgiveness;
CGE7d -promotes
the sacredness of life;
CGE7e -witnesses
Catholic social teaching by promoting equality, democracy, and solidarity for a
just, peaceful and compassionate society;
CGE7f -respects
and affirms the diversity and interdependence of the world’s peoples and
cultures;
CGE7g -respects
and understands the history, cultural heritage and pluralism of today’s
contemporary society;
CGE7h -exercises
the rights and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship;
CGE7i -respects
the environment and uses resources wisely;
CGE7j -contributes
to the common good.
Unit 1 | Unit 3 | Course Profiles Main
Menu