Please note:
This document is best suited for on-screen use. Some layout may have been
altered during the creation of this web page.
It is recommended that you download the "pdf" version of this
Course Profile for printing and the "Word, Mac, or WordPerfect"
versions for working with or adapting the Course Profile to meet your
instructional needs.
Course Profile
Understanding Canadian Law, Grade 11, University/College Preparation,
Catholic and Public
Course Overview
Course
Profiles are professional development materials designed to help teachers
implement the new Grade 11 secondary school curriculum. These materials were
created by writing partnerships of school boards and subject associations. The
development of these resources was funded by the Ontario Ministry of Education.
This document reflects the views of the developers and not necessarily those of
the Ministry. Permission is given to reproduce these materials for any purpose
except profit. Teachers are also encouraged to amend, revise, edit, cut, paste,
and otherwise adapt this material for educational purposes.
Any
references in this document to particular commercial resources, learning
materials, equipment, or technology reflect only the opinions of the writers of
this sample Course Profile, and do not reflect any official endorsement by the
Ministry of Education or by the Partnership of School Boards that supported the
production of the document.
© Queen’s
Printer for Ontario, 2001
Public
and Catholic District School Board Writing Teams – Understanding Canadian Law
Catholic
Project Manager
Mike
Taylor, London Catholic District School Board
Catholic
Writing Team
Marion
Austin, Lead Writer, London Catholic District School Board
Jim
Sweeney, London Catholic District School Board
Peter
Legge, London Catholic District School Board
Reviews
Dan
Keane, Religion Advisor
Oliver
Stoetzen, College Reviewer
Richard
Vendrig, Durham Catholic School Board
Public
Project Leader
Allan
Hux, Toronto District School Board, President OHCA
Public
Writing Team
Murray
Locke, Toronto District School Board
Alex
MacKinnon, Toronto District School Board
George
Mavraganis, Toronto District School Board
Reviewers
Don
Kendal, Toronto District School Board
John
Myers, OISE/UT
Ava
Szczurko, Toronto District School Board
Nancy
Smith, Toronto District School Board
Librarians
Esther
Rosenfeld, DWC, Library/Learning Resources, TDSB
Mark
Kaminski, Library Consultant, TDSB
Linda
McKee, Librarian, Albert Campbell CI, TDSB
Associations
Ontario
History and Social Studies Teacher Association (OHASSTA)
Ontario
History Consultants Association (OHCA)
Course
Overview
Understanding
Canadian Law, Grade 11, University/College Preparation, CLU3M
This
course explores legal issues that directly affect students’ lives. To develop
an appreciation of the Canadian legal system, students examine the historical
roots of Canadian law and expand on their understanding of the role of
government in making laws. Students also become familiar with the rights and
freedoms that all Canadians enjoy as a result of the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms. Students acquire a practical knowledge of Canada’s legal system,
both criminal and civil, and learn how to analyse legal issues. They are given
opportunities to develop informed opinions on legal issues and to defend those
opinions and communicate legal knowledge in a variety of ways and settings,
including legal research projects, and mock trials and debates.
This
course, Understanding the Law, extends the development of attitudes and values
based on Catholic social teachings for Ontario Catholic School Graduates.
Opportunities are given to students to integrate their faith with civic duty
and responsibility. Students become familiar with events which are a part of
the Catholic Church’s history such as the development of Mosaic law. When
students examine the question of human rights, they begin to appreciate the
relevance of Catholic social justice teachings. This course involves activities
that encourage students to act morally and legally as persons formed in
Catholic traditions. Law course graduates should be effective communicators of
the Good News of Jesus Christ in their attitudes and approaches to historical
and contemporary issues involving the law.
The
study of the Canadian legal system is an essential part of Canadian studies. An
understanding of the process of the
legal system is a vital part of the operation of a democratic and orderly
society and of a student’s education. Students who understand the processes of
the law in our society are much more likely to be effective members of Canadian
society. They are also be better equipped to understand and appreciate the dynamic
nature of the law in response to social change as well as the traditional
values the law seeks to uphold.
Students
gain an understanding of the origins of our legal system, the development of
human rights as a concept in our society, the process of criminal law, and the
settlement of civil disputes in our country. At every opportunity, students
learn the origins of the process and concepts, how they apply today and some of
the current issues that surround them. They are then able to see both the continuity
of the legal tradition and the current challenges that may shape change in the
law.
The
course content is appropriate to research into legal cases and social issues
that surround the law. By framing inquiry skills within a legal context,
students can be taught to appreciate the demands of critical thinking and
rigorous approaches to research as they develop skills in their senior years in
high school. The research and analytic skills necessary for the investigation
of these subjects should be dealt with over the entire course. The teaching of
skills over the entire length of the course allows students more time to
investigate and examine topics of interest and to develop research skills.
As
much as possible, students should be given opportunities to use technology to
conduct their research. Through use of these technologies, students become
familiar with the wide range of their potential use for future study and for
the working world. Increasingly, statistical information and professional
journals in the field of Canadian law are becoming available in electronic
format.
This is a university/college
preparation course that uses Canadian History in the Twentieth Century (Academic
or Applied) as a prerequisite. This course should equip students with the
knowledge and skills necessary for entrance to specific university and college
programs. Teaching and learning techniques emphasize the development of
independent learning and research skills that students are required to
demonstrate.
The course
is divided into four units of study. The table below indicates a suggested time
for these units.
|
* Unit 1 |
Heritage |
20 hours |
|
Unit 2 |
Rights and Freedoms |
20 hours |
|
* Unit 3 |
Criminal Law and Procedures |
35 hours |
|
Unit 4 |
Regulation and Dispute Resolution |
35 hours |
* These
units are fully developed in this Course Profile.
Time: 20 hours
Unit
Description
In this
introductory unit, students develop an understanding of what law is and why
societies have laws. An examination of the historical roots of Canadian law
assists students to develop an understanding of the Canadian legal system.
Students examine the role of government, its agencies, and the courts in
making, changing, or interpreting the law. Throughout the unit, students
incorporate many of the methods of legal inquiry. With the culminating
activity, students are asked to create a constitution for the new colony on
Mars. After an examination of a number of constitutions, students are asked to
create a new constitution and to present their work to their classmates, and
individually to submit a written report. For students in Catholic schools, this
unit provides an opportunity to study the Church’s legal traditions, in
particular Mosaic law. Students examine the Dogmatic Constitution of the
Catholic Church and enhance their understanding of the rights and
responsibilities of Canadian citizenship.
Unit
Overview Chart
|
Cluster |
Expectations |
Assessment |
Focus |
|
1 The Need for Law |
HTV.01, LIV.03, HT1.01, HT1.02, LI1.03, LI4.03, CGE2b, 2d, 4e, 5e |
Knowledge/ Communication |
Examine different groups to determine types of rules. Examine the need for and the purposes of law. |
|
2 The Historical Roots of Law |
HTV.02, LIV.01, LIV.02, HT2.01, HT2.02, HT2.03, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI3.01, LI4.04, CGE1d, 2a, 3b, 7e, 7g |
Knowledge/ Communication Application |
Locate ancient civilizations on a map. Examine quotes from legal historical figures. Research contributions of different groups to Canadian legal system. Complete an organizer. |
|
3 The Constitution of Canada |
HTV.03, LIV.03, HT3.01, LI1.04, LI4.03, CGE2b, 2d, 7h |
Knowledge/ Communication Application |
Define what a constitution is. Examine the continual evolution of the Canadian Constitution. Examine the Canadian Constitution. |
|
4 Role of Government, Courts, and individuals in making, interpreting and changing the law |
HTV03, LIV.02, LIV.03, HT3.02, HT3.03, HT3.04, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI3.01, LI3.03, LI4.04CGE2b, 2d, 3b, 3c, 4a, 7e |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Examine reasons why laws change. Propose a new law or change an existing one. Study process of making a law. |
|
5 Categories and Types of Laws |
HTV.03, HT1.03, HT1.04, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI4.03, CGE2b, 2d, 7h |
Knowledge/ Communication |
Examine classifications of law. Examine different scenarios and determine if public/private law and which classification. |
|
6 The Martian Constitution |
LIV.03, LI4.01, LI4.02, LI4.05, CGE2b, 2d, 3f, 5a, 5e |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Design and present a new constitution. |
Unit
Culminating Activity
The
Martian Constitution
– After examining a number of constitutions from different time periods,
countries and organizations, students create a constitution for a new colony on
the planet Mars.
Time: 20 hours
Unit
Description
This unit
explores the sources of Canadian rights and freedoms. Students examine how
rights and freedoms may differ and conflict. An examination of historical and
contemporary barriers to the equal enjoyment of human rights in Canada helps
students evaluate the impact of these barriers. Finally, as a result of their
study of the rights and freedoms enshrined in Canadian law, students develop an
understanding of how these rights and freedoms are interpreted, limited, and
enforced in Canada and in Ontario. For students in Ontario’s Catholic schools,
this unit enhances their understanding of the influence of the Catholic Church
on the development of human rights. They also examine the contributions of
individual Catholics and organizations in developing and increasing awareness
of human rights issues (e.g., Jean Vanier, Development and Peace)
Unit
Overview Chart
|
Cluster |
Expectations |
Assessment |
Focus |
|
1 The Development of Rights and Freedoms in Canada |
RFV.01, LIV.01, LIV.04, RF1.01, RF1.02, RF2.02, LI1.02, LI1.04, LI4.03, LI4.04 |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Identify influences on development of human rights in Canada. Explain key human rights concepts. Evaluate contributions of individuals/groups to human rights. |
|
2 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Ontario Human Rights Code |
RFV.03, LIV.01, LIV.04, RF3.01, RF3.05, RF3.06, LI.03, LI.04, LI4.03 |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication |
Describe rights and freedoms in the Canadian Charter. Explain protections provided by Ontario Human Rights Code. Distinguish between protections offered by these two documents. |
|
3 Rights and Freedoms - Conflict between, denial of, and limitations of |
RFV.02, RFV.03, LIV.01, LIV.04, RF1.03, RF2.01, RF3.02, LI1.01, LI.1.03, LI1.04, LI4.02 |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Analyse situations in which rights and freedoms may conflict. Describe situations in which rights in Canada have been denied. Analyse situations in which a right or freedom may be limited. |
|
4 The Interpretation and Enforcement of Charter Rights and Freedoms |
RFV.03, LIV.04, RF3.03, RF3.04, LI1.04, LI4.03, LI4.04 |
Knowledge/ Communication |
Explain how human rights legislation and the courts attempt to balance minority and majority rights. Explain the role of the judiciary in interpreting the Charter and the role of the government in enforcing Charter rights. |
|
5 Human Rights Violations |
RFV.03, LIV.04, RF3.07, LI1.04, LI4.02, LI4.03 |
Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Describe procedures for hearing complaints about human rights violations. |
Unit
Culminating Activity - Suggestions
Human
Rights Violations -
Students prepare a case dealing with human rights violations and present to a
board such as the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the Board of Inquiry (Human
Rights Code), or the Office of the Ombudsman. The prepared case could include:
arguments outlining the human rights violations; relevant Charter sections; all
completed forms; oral presentation to a mock tribunal; suggestions for
appropriate remedies.
Legal
Report - Students
research a legal case in which there has been a violation of rights under the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and present their findings in a written
report. The report could include: detailed description of the rights violation;
explanation of which Charter Sections are relevant; possible remedies to
correct the violation. This would be a good activity in which to use Internet
research.
Time: 35 hours
Unit
Description
This unit
introduces students to the main concepts of criminal law in Canada. They first
examine specific terms that govern both the existence and classification of
crime. They then apply some of those understandings to the study of youth crime
and how Canadian society deals with this issue. Students then look at the
investigation of crime and the role of police in investigation and arrest. An
examination of the courts and trial process gives students a deeper
understanding of the adversarial system and the roles of various officials and
citizens in the court. Students look at the decision-making process involved in
sentencing criminals to prison, and the rights of victims in these situations.
Unit
Overview Chart
|
Cluster |
Expectations |
Assessment |
Focus |
|
1 The Definition of Crime |
CLV.01, CLV.03, CL1.01, CL1.02, LI1.01, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI4.03, CGE2b, 2d, 3b, 7h |
Knowledge/ Communication |
Develop a definition for crime. Use examples to apply their understanding of types of crime and conditions for a crime as well as conviction in court. |
|
2 The Law and Young People |
CLV.05, CL5.01, CL5.02, CL5.03, LI2.01, LI3.01, LI3.03, LI4.02, LI4.03, CGE 2b, 2d, 3c, 4f, 5e |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication |
Prepare a set of rights for young people. Compare the YOA with the Juvenile Delinquents Act. Use surveys in the school to prepare recommendations to a Parliamentary Committee |
|
3 Arrest and Pre-Trial Process |
CLV.02, CL2.01, CL2.02, CL2.03, LI1.01. LI1.04, CGE2b, 2d, 4f, 7h |
Knowledge/ Application |
Students research and present short role-plays on
pre-trial procedure. |
|
4 The Court System and Trial Process |
CLV.03, CL3.01, CL3.02, CL3.03, CL3.04, LI1.02, LI3.03, LI4.02, LI4.03, LI4.06, CGE 2b, 2c, 5b, 5g, 7h |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Application |
Investigate Canadian trial procedure. Create a poster visually displaying the jobs layout of the court. Evaluate the role of the jury system. |
|
5 Sentencing and Prisons |
CLV.04, CL4.01, CL4.02, CL4.03, CL4.04, LI2.01, LI3.03, LI4.01, LI4.03, CGE 2b, 2d, 3c, 4f, 7h |
Knowledge/ Application |
Brainstorm purposes of sentencing. Prepare short oral reports on the various types of sentences and programs. Prepare a visitor’s pamphlet for a model. |
|
6 Mock Trial |
HTV.03, CLV.02, CLV.03, CLV. 04, CLV. 05, LIV.01, LIV.02, LIV.03, LIV.04, CL1.01, CL1.03, CL2. 01, CL3.01, CL3.02, CL3.03, CL3.04, CL4.02, CL4.03, CL5.03, LI1.02, LI1.03, LI1.04, LI2.01, LI2.02, LI2.04, LI4.01, LI4.02, LI4.03, LI4.04, LI4.05, LI4.06 |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Application |
Students research and role-play a case in Canadian criminal law. |
Unit
Culminating Activity - Suggestions
A
mock trial is a recommended culminating activity for this unit. Students are
involved in researching the various aspects of the court as well as the various
roles in the court system. The trial could then be presented in a larger room
in the school such as the dramatic arts room.
An
alternative culminating activity would be for students to follow the process of
a criminal trial, if possible, using the various electronic media. Students
could then summarize, analyse, and react to the process of this trial.
Time: 35 hours
Unit
Description
Students
study the structure of the Canadian private law system. The unit is divided
into four areas of concentration. The sub-topics within the unit are organized
in a manner that builds upon the understanding of the differences between
criminal and civil law, which leads to an examination of how the processes,
legal institutions, and methods involved in bringing a civil dispute to trial
operate. This leads to an examination of how the law applies to family matters.
Finally, students analyse the role of law as it applies to contractual
obligations, torts, and claims for compensation for personal loss. Students
continue to expand their skills of legal inquiry in this unit. This unit offers
students an excellent opportunity to further develop research skills in the
analysis and interpretation of data related to private and civil law
Unit
Overview Chart
|
Cluster |
Expectations |
Assessment |
Focus |
|
1 |
RDV.01, RD1.01, RD1.02, LI1.01, LI1.03, LI1.04, CGE 2b, 2d, 5g |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Differences between Civil and Criminal Law |
|
2 |
RDV.02, RD2.01, RD2.01, RD2.03, LI1.02, LI4.01, LI4.03, LI4.06, CGE 2b, 2c, 2d |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Civil Procedure |
|
3 |
RDV.03, RD3.01, RD3.02, RD3.03, RD3.04, RD3.05, LI1.03, LI3.01, LI3.03, LI4.03, LI4.06, CGE1b, 1d, 1i, 2b, 2d, 3d, 6c, 7a |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Marriage, Separation, and Divorce |
|
4 |
RDV.04, RD4.01, RD4.02. RD4.03, RD4.04, LI1.02, LI2.01, LI2.03, LI4.03, LI4.06, CGE 1d, 2a, 2c, 3b, 3d, 4f, 5g, 7a, 7h |
Knowledge/ Thinking/Inquiry Communication Application |
Civil Wrongs and Remedies |
Unit
Culminating Activity
A
culminating activity for this unit could be a public information legal pamphlet
developed in groups to explain a particular aspect of private law to the
general public. Students could use a variety of technologies in their research
as well as a presentation of the final product to the class.
This course provides students an
opportunity to explore, analyse, and reflect on the study of law through
diverse teaching and learning strategies. Students have multiple opportunities
to hone their skills in communication through formal presentations, role
playing, writing in role, and persuasive writing. Critical thinking skills such
as formulating a thesis, identifying bias and viewpoint, debating, analysing primary
sources, and problem-solving are a focus of many activities. Focused inquiry,
data analysis, note-taking and guided Internet searches are examples of the
research skills that students practise. Co-operative group learning is another
important active learning strategy fundamental to many activities in this
profile. Tasks are designed to develop skills and concepts through a range of
student learning styles. Each unit overview states specific teaching/learning
strategies as well as the skills development and assessment/evaluation. Many
important skills are developed in the activities in the units.
The
Teaching/Learning Strategies employed in the Grade 11 University/College Law
course should:
·
encourage
maximum student engagement in the learning activity;
·
encourage
student choice regarding the processes and products of learning in the Law
classroom;
·
include
whole class, small group, and individual instruction;
·
use
electronic technology as appropriate;
·
address
a variety of learning styles;
·
provide
opportunities for genuine inquiry - to generate questions, apply a variety of
investigative approaches and communicate learning in a variety of ways;
·
encourage
students in self and peer evaluation;
·
use
formative assessment to provide opportunities for practice and consolidation;
·
make
authentic connections with the classroom, the school, and the local community;
·
respect
the cultural diversity of
The
subject discipline of Law has its own particular ways in which language is used
to express concepts. In order to help all students, but especially ESL/ELD
students, teaching and learning strategies should show formative attention to
the following aspects of language in written and oral forms:
·
specialized
vocabulary/idioms
·
use
of a wide range of tenses, and of active and passive voice
·
words,
phrases, and clausal structures that indicate:
·
sequence/chronology
·
cause/effect
relationships
·
contrast/comparatives/superlatives
·
statements
of opinion, interpretation, inference
·
statements
of speculation/hypothesis/prediction
·
statements
of belief, intent, necessity, persuasion, evaluation, definition
·
explanations
of reason
·
formation
of questions for formal and informal circumstances, oral or written
·
active
listening skills: e.g., phrases and syntax that express encouragement, requests
for repetition, clarification, and restatement
·
activities
such as reading/listening tasks (case-study/video-viewing) that need a specific
and concrete product expected of students
·
completion
of a graphic organizer/re-enactment or structured oral response
·
note-taking/summarizing
·
non-verbal
communication skills, of particular importance to presentation tasks
Language development and the expression of
concepts taught are greatly facilitated if written tasks are reinforced by oral
tasks, and vice versa. All learners with difficulties benefit greatly if models
or scaffolds for oral and written expressive communicative functions are
initially provided for them by their teachers.
The
Achievement Chart, which is the basis for assessment and evaluation in this
course, is found on pages 246 and 247 of The
The
The
activities and performance tasks in this profile are examples of some
strategies teachers may use with their classes. The following are some generic
suggestions for assessment and evaluation techniques in Law courses:
·
provide
opportunities for student learning to improve by using formative assessment
tools in each unit, e.g., visual organizers, practice quiz, self and peer
editing of written work, teacher feedback;
·
model
the skill that you want the students to master, e.g., formulating a thesis,
note-taking, report writing;
·
share
with your students clearly-developed criteria for their assessment and
evaluation, e.g., checklists, rubrics. Developing these tools with students
helps to clarify how and why they are being assessed or evaluated;
·
accommodate
a variety of learning styles and special needs through the modifications
suggested in the activities and suggestions for how they may improve their
performance;
·
use
assessment tools that are appropriate for the expectations being addressed and
that relate to the categories on the achievement charts;
·
ensure
that criteria used for assessment match expectations in culminating activities
that involve performance assessment;
·
in
performance tasks involving group work, ensure that these tasks build in
positive interdependence and individual accountability;
·
rubrics
should make it clear to students why they scored as they did and what steps
they need to take to improve;
·
match
the assessment/evaluation strategy to the teaching/learning strategy.
Students
should become competent researchers and writers through the activities
suggested in this profile. They will also practise and demonstrate a variety of
written and verbal communication skills.
Seventy
per cent of the grade will be based on assessments and evaluations conducted
throughout the course. Thirty per cent of the grade will be based on a final
evaluation in the form of an examination, performance, essay, and/or other
method of evaluation.
Final
Course Summative Evaluation
The
Ontario Curriculum, Grades 9 to 12, Program Planning and Assessment states that thirty percent of the
grade is based on a final evaluation in the form of an examination,
performance, essay, and/or other method of evaluation suitable to the course
content and administered towards the end of the course.
Decisions
about how the thirty percent will be allocated are ultimately up to individual
teachers, schools or boards. However, it is recommended that the thirty percent
should be divided between at least two activities.
An
examination of the expectations for the course, Understanding Canadian Law,
reveals a number which would be best accommodated through a research paper.
These expectations would include the following:
Overall
Expectations
LIV.01 -
use research methods appropriately to gather, organize, and synthesize
information;
LIV.02 -
evaluate the credibility of sources.
Specific
Expectations
LI1.02 -
effectively conduct legal research, using traditional and non-traditional
sources of information;
LI2.03 -
evaluate the credibility of sources and information by checking for logical
errors, accuracy, and underlying assumption, including prejudices and biases;
LI2.04 -
evaluate the credibility of published and Internet sources by analysing the
quantity and quality of evidence presented, as well as the methods used by
authors to support their claims (e.g., the use of footnotes);
LI4.05
- write clear, coherent, and logically organized reports, papers, and essays,
observing the rules for ethical use of research material and following an
accepted format for documenting sources.
It is
expected that students would conduct research and write their essay throughout
the course. To assist students with the writing of their paper, teachers should
use a process that has students submit different components of the paper such
as the selection of a topic, resource list, introduction, and outline. It is
also suggested that teachers spend some time in class teaching students how to
evaluate Internet sources. The essay should be handed in towards the end of the
course for evaluation.
Every
effort is made to assist all students in achieving success in their Law course.
Specific adaptations and accommodations are recommended with each activity.
Teachers should realize that if expectations are modified extensively, then the
nature of the credit can be affected. Individual Education Plans for
exceptional students provide teachers with specific learning strategies that
work best with individual students. As well, the proficiency levels outlined in
The
There
are a variety of strategies that can be used for those students with special
needs. History teachers are encouraged to work with the Special Education
teacher to review exceptional students’ IEPs (Individual Education Plans) to
decide the best course of action to assist them in meeting the expectations of
the Grade 11 University/College Law course. Students with specific learning
difficulties require specific modifications to meet their particular needs in
terms of learning, communication, and expression strengths and weaknesses.
Students with attention deficit and behavioural challenges need to have
opportunities for active learning and interaction within a controlled
environment. The variety of learning strategies and student performance tasks
provide teachers with some guidance, but each exceptional student’s program
will require appropriate modifications based on the assessment and suggestions
included in the Individual Education Plan.
Technology can also be important in
modifying activities and accommodating for special needs. For example, prior
bookmarking of key Internet sites will help to maximize on-line time. There are
many enrichment opportunities for gifted students who may explore the issues
and personalities in greater depth or from different perspectives.
When
planning adaptation(s) of the Understanding Canadian Law, Grade 11,
University/College courses for ESL students, teachers should recognize and
reflect on all aspects of language development. The academic needs of the newly
arrived student to
Teachers
should select resources that relate to the ESL/ELD Curriculum Policy Document
Strand’s expectations:
Like all
learners, ESL/ELD learners have different learning styles. Therefore, a wide
variety of teaching/learning strategies and assessment/evaluation techniques
should be used in any classroom. Many assessment tools for ESL/ELD students are
formative, both in the assessment of understanding of concepts and the
acquisition and practise of the specifically identified language forms
necessary to express those concepts. The ESL/ELD learners’ self-esteem and
motivation to learn benefits greatly when courses allow expression of their
individual skills, interests, and varied life experiences in the family,
communities, and countries of origin. Courses should also display sensitivity
to the diversity of cultural, ethnic, religious beliefs and customs,
socio-economic levels, and family structures of newcomer. Subject content
should be presented in ways that focus on its relevance to ESL/ELD students
needs, be they communicative/language, acculturation, day-to-day survival,
social, physical, emotional, or cognitive.
Note
Concerning Permissions
Units in
this profile make reference to the use of specific texts, magazines, films, and
videos. Before reproducing materials for student use from books and magazines,
teachers need to ensure that their board has a Cancopy licence and that
resources they wish to use are covered by this licence. Before screening videos
for their students, teachers need to ensure that their board/school has
obtained the appropriate public performance videocassette licence from an
authorized distributor (e.g., Audio Cine Films Inc.). Teachers are also
reminded that much of the material on the Internet is protected by copyright.
That copyright is usually owned by the person or organization that created the
work. Reproduction of any work or a substantial part of any work on the
Internet is not allowed without the permission of the owner.
Any
current approved Canadian Law textbook.